



|
|
A belief widely shared is that estrogen protects against skeletal loss, and
that it is not until menopause that women precipitously lose a percentage of
calcium from their bones. Women with a concern for health often begin taking
calcium supplements protectively years
before the climacteric. If you are a
women who is active, if you lift heavy groceries, if you drink milk, if you
watch your RDA and swallow your calcium, you may feel that your measures are
adequate. Unfortunately, they may not be.
I am not sedentary and have never smoked. I started
running in my 30s, and developed a joy in fitness that was expressed in both
aerobic and weight-bearing ways.
Exercise became a daily routine, almost a
necessity, which contributed richly to my life without controlling it.
Long ago
I developed a taste for low-fat, nutritious food.
Long ago I added calcium to my
regimen of supplements.
But I am slight of build, and favor my father’s mother.
Recollection of her frail, bended frame has always haunted me.
Most
people fear some physical impediment above others.
My terror has always been
that my eventual fate is to shrink, to twist into painful immobility, trapped
inside a bony, misshapen, easily-shattered shell.
At the age of 47, still
menstruating, still active, still purposefully directed toward health, I
arranged a bone-mineral density (BMD) scan.
It is a fairly fast, painless procedure. One lies supine as the x-ray device scans pelvis to ribs and a bony
image emerges on a nearby computer screen. I wanted to allay my
fears.
The report was cryptic but intelligible. T-scores compare bone density of the patient with that of a
normal 30-year-old. The World Health Organization defines osteopenia as
bone-density T-scores of more than one, and less than 2.5, standard deviations below
the mean; osteoporosis proper exceeds 2.5. With each standard deviation
below normal, risk of fracture approximately doubles. Evaluation of my
lumbar spine yielded
a T-score of two and one-third standard deviations below that of normal bone
density. The diagnosis was osteopenia, the preface to osteoporosis.
The presence of
estrogen failed to prevent a premenopausal bone fragility, and
the
fate I feared was waiting in the wings. But why?
Partial reasons present themselves. I was a thin child and, with
anything but spaghetti, an
indifferent eater. As a teenager, I fell headlong into all
the fast-food traps, and all through my 20s my eating habits were erratic; thus, at the most important times of bone development, long
before cultivating my taste for nutritious food, my dietary habits failed me. Family history is always important, and my grandmother provided
genetic reason. There may be other hidden genetic reasons as well, such as
possible problems in utilizing vitamin D or calcium. Topical corticosteroids I have used for years on eczema might have
contributed a small part. The average onset of menses in girls is at
the age of 12; mine occurred not until the age of 16, and such pubertal delay
might have its own detrimental effect on bone mass. For reasons still being explored, even a history of depression,
for which I qualify, has
recently been connected with osteoporosis. If my search for answers has not brought one immutable reason, at least
any unbounded
faith in my current and longstanding (but not longstanding enough), exertion-filled, vitamin-popping lifestyle is restrained.
|
Remodeling is constant in adult bone:
At the cellular level, osteoclasts destroy and osteoblasts rebuild
it. The process renews and repairs. But as we age, rebuilding slows. Knowing that, we seek calcium and consider ourselves
safe. Many drink milk. Although milk contains plenty of calcium, by
deactivating critical enzymes pasteurization prevents our bodies
from incorporating that source of calcium. Actually, the belief
that calcium protects against bone loss is flawed. Even with vitamin D,
even with magnesium, calcium is not easily absorbed, and even if it makes
its way to the bloodstream its integration can be complicated by genetic
traits, including variations in vitamin D receptors, that are just
beginning to be understood. Studies have plotted the decline of bone mass
in women who religiously swallow their calcium supplements.
|
|
Today, however, we are fortunate. We
have remedies.
|
Gone are the days of my
grandmother, when the painful shrinking of a brittle skeleton was accepted
as immutable fate. Now remedies for bone loss are available. These
include estrogen, calcitonin, and a class of drugs called bisphosphonates.
In common, they tend to inhibit bone resorption and even to increase bone
mineral density. Each has its pluses and minuses. Estrogen therapy is
often prescribed for women after their own production of estrogen has
ceased. It is believed to inhibit bone resorption, and it can increase
bone mineral density in the spine. But many women are unwilling to prolong
menstruation, and breast cancer can be a concern with estrogen therapy.
Calcitonin is a polypeptide hormone secreted by the
thyroid. It must be
injected daily, although now an intranasal formulation is available.
To me the most encouraging class of drugs is the bisphosphonates,
which bind to the bony matrix, inhibiting its breakdown, and are retained in bone for many years. Inhibition of bone
resorption by bisphosphonates is robust, and because they either attach to
bone or are excreted from the body without affecting anything else, when taken
correctly bisphosphonates are apparently quite free of side effects. But they are not easily absorbed
when taken by mouth, and to be effective they must share the stomach with
nothing but water. Each new generation of bisphosphonates
developed, however, is stronger than the last.
In addition to these chemical treatments, veterinarians
have been exploring an incredible possibility. What if vibration
strengthened bone? Skeletons of sheep with
induced osteoporosis have been building bone in response to short, 20-minute
daily intervals of low-frequency sonic vibration (personal communication, 1999). Soon it may be possible
to obtain one's skeletal strengthening from a daily encounter with select
vibrations.
Although remedies for osteoporosis exist, they may not be considered
by healthcare providers until the
diagnosis presents itself. Remedies are safeguards only if appropriately
applied. Do not assume uncritically that, in the absence of such secondary
causes as renal failure or hyperthyroidism, skeletal resorption in women
does not commence in earnest until menopause shrinks the estrogen supply.
My spine argues
otherwise. If you’ve passed the menopause, avoid the
mistake of relying uncritically on calcium. And don’t feel exempt simply
because you’re a man. Whatever your age and whichever your sex, if you
have risk factors for osteoporosis, investigate that risk. Don’t
await that first fracture.
|
top
| |